Ziyad Yaghi and Mohammed Omar Aly Hassan: What the US Media is Hiding

Ziyad Yaghi and Mohammed Omar Aly Hassan: What the US Media is Hiding.

 

As one of the presiding jangling judges at the recent appeal conference cloyingly retorted in a burlesque manner to the respectful complaint of conviction solely on association by Hassan’s  attorney, Dan Boyce, “everyone that’s named as a conspirator has to be guilty…you don’t have these agreements written up and notarized.” Boyce responded,

”There is no doubt that Omar Hassan did not need to know every single co-conspirator, I agree…but I respectfully submit that if you search through the record,  when you comb through it and read all the testimony, it’s [conspiracy and suspected associations of the defendants] just not there.”

I am confident that if an enumerated list of the evidence was publicly categorized toward ‘each’ individual defendant, the results would be shockingly apparent for even an australopithecines’ version of a Hill Billy. Rednecks or Klansmen are another funambulism.

Ziyad Yaghi and Mohammed Omar Aly Hassan: What the US Media is Hiding

Ziyad Yaghi and Mohammed Omar Aly Hassan: What the US Media is Hiding

2 Live Crew, 2 Pac, AAPER, afghanistan, Anes Subaisac, apartheid, Arab-American Institute, C-Murder, CCTJP, Chechnya, CIA Drug Trafficking, Collective Consciousness, Conspiracy to Commit Terrorism, Corey Miller, Corruption in American Law Enforcement, Corruption in US Government, Dan Boyce, Daniel Boyd, Elvis Presley, Evan Kohlmann, Gangsta Rap, George Creel, Hysen Sherifi, Ice T, Iran Contra Affair, Israel, Jason Kellhofer, Jordan, Kosovo, Laila Yaghi, Louis Flanagan, Masjid Shishan, Minority Report, Mohammed Hamid, Mohammed Omar Hassan Aly, My Pet Jawa, ndaa, Nelson Mandella, Nick Navarro, North Carolina 7 terrorists, North Carolina Terrorism, Nour Judah, Pakistan, Patriot Act, Plato\’s Allegory of the Cave, Poverty in the US, raleigh jihad, Roger Elbert, Rolling Stones, Russel Simmons, salem news, Sean Bell, Siraj Davis, South Africa, Southern Racism, Sylvester Stallone, Taliban, Terrorism, The Expendables, The Jawa Report, Time Warner, Tom Cruise, Trayvon Martin, Tri County Technical College, US political prisoners, War of Terrorism, Wrongful Imprisonment in the US, Yasmin Cass, Zarqa Jordan, Ziyad Yaghi

via Ziyad Yaghi and Mohammed Omar Aly Hassan: What the US Media is Hiding.

Ziyad Yaghi and Mohammed Omar Aly Hassan: What the US Media is Hiding

Last month, a Federal Appeals Court upheld convictions of Ziyad Yaghi, Hysen Sherifi, and Mohammed Omar Aly Hassan for Conspiracy to Commit Terrorism. The repudiation of the aforementioned appeal is approximately 50 pages. Its pristine quality is extraordinary, and is not a meticulously and noteworthy derived collection which should be lazily set aside for later reading. Without hesitation, this tendentious tautology should be thrown with full force into the trash! If one felt compelled to employ a euphemistic depiction in frank reverence for its overweening authors, suffice it to say that this imprecation is a verbose logomachy that creatively manipulates an enormous and esoteric lexicon to express tiny ideas. My only positive reactive comment is a sesquipedalian paroxysm. In regards to the flamboyant prosecutor Jason Kellhofer, regrettably a humanitarian did not dragoon his poor mother into tossing this scurf aside, while feeding and clothing the stork instead.

via Ziyad Yaghi and Mohammed Omar Aly Hassan: What the US Media is Hiding.

Gaza Camp The Untold Story | Editor’s Choice | Ammon News

Gaza Camp The Untold Story | Editor's Choice | Ammon News.

Ziyad Yaghi and Mohammed Omar Aly Hassan: What the US Media is Hiding

Ziyad Yaghi and Mohammed Omar Aly Hassan: What the US Media is Hiding.

 

Ziyad Yaghi and Mohammed Omar Aly Hassan: What the US Media is Hiding

Manipulation of Religious and Secular Vernaculars

All of the above constricted minds of the War OF Terrorism cannot grasp or intentionally disregard the distinction between the following religious and secular vernaculars:

Allah commands all Muslims to perform jihad against the kufar.

Muslims in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Palestine have a right to defend themselves if suffering underneath such unjust contraptions of apartheid, ethnic cleansings, and invasions enacted or funded by what they perceive as a foreign aggressor.

The pith of the former and latter is very simple to a rational finder of truth and justice, one-without being a Deist and solely possessing average ‘common sense’ rationale-who could deem that humans have a ‘natural’ right to defend themselves in various ways that meet their certain circumstances and situation, ‘if attacked first’. Just as Islamophobes-with shameless agog and a  leer-hijack  the term ‘kufar’ (disbeliever) from the Quran’s verses under the context of defensive war  to dissemble the violent offensive and intolerant nature of Islam- the Kapellmeister Jason Kellhofer and Evan Kohlmann and those barefacedly associated with the prosecution of the seven defendants-have also hijacked Islamic terms out of context-assuming foreign and Western Muslims the same- in their repulsive thespian shenanigan against the innocent seven. They wrongly assume that fundamental Islamic vernacular is an immediate red flag for terrorism, effacing the fact that there are millions of innocuous Islamic fundamentalists as Dr. Zakir Naik and Yusuf Estes, who openly condemn violence and intolerance.

In the following video interview, is one Othman Buraik, among many fundamental Muslims, whose discountenance and animus may provoke immature rage or over-reactive accusations of ‘terrorist’. He is not a terrorist, he just doesn’t like a besieging American foreign policy and is extremely proud of his religion. The thoughts he espouses in the video are ‘the same’ as the farcical harrowing  composition of what Kellhofer and the US government concocted to describe as an alien ideology in the 7 wrongfully convicted of North Carolina. The world community should humbly beg the obtruding and omnipotent US government if such din of ‘free’ thoughts may be allowed or is such ‘natural’ right the sole possession of the United States government and its templar crusaders as Jason Kellhofer? And when shall those inalienable rights be summarily transferred back with a blessed recrudescence  to our creator and us? Hundreds would testify that brother Othman, is one of the kindest and harmless humans one may meet. He is a responsible father, a community oriented Samaritan, would give his only shirt from his back to anyone, has never harmed an insect, and he isn’t a mujahedeen. Shockingly, not everyone who hates America is a terrorist. And not everyone who believes in Islamic Sharia law is either.

An outspoken rhapsodizing fundamental Muslim who maintains the belief in Muslims’ ‘natural’ right to preserve themselves against aggression and criticizes US foreign policy -especially in regards to the horripilation at decades of horrendous injustice in Palestine- is not terrorism. It correlates to ‘common sense’ and a love for truth, justice, and peace with God and humanity above nationalism. As the sagacious Thomas Paine stated, “the World is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion.” Although taboo and occasionally potentially dangerous under circumstance to aver, the unstated truth is that the US’ demented persistent support of a palatial apartheid Israel- which includes reprehensible ethnic cleansing, vulpine discrimination in immigration and migration policies, atrocious harassment via discretionary application of laws designed for a discriminatory detrimental effect, murder of non-combatants with more precision-accurate technological weaponry than the dearth of innocuous Arab hillbilly insurgents these deadly instruments are employed against, media silence to marginalize and secrete such policies’ effect, collective punishment on women and children alike in a gossamerly recognizable and dappled historical pattern of Western COIN tactics employed from Latin America to Africa to Asia and so on, perverse wrongful imprisonment on prima facie corpuscles not held equally toward others, discreet torture, and ‘worse’ against innocent indigenous Palestinians for the languishing length of over 5 US fascist Gestapo-like decades-caused the attacks of 9-11, lost the HUMINT reconnaissance on the ground in the Middle East which technology could and cannot compensate, created the formerly unheard of extremists we are battling now,  dramatically affected the lack of US success in Middle Eastern theaters of conflict, poisoned the minds of a paltry number of our nation into an  intractable xenophobia Islamophobia, wreaked havoc on our fragile economy as the returns from Middle Eastern investments in war are currently volatile at best,  have upheld our progenitor’s America to the eyes of the world community as a blundering hypocrite and maniacal tyranny questionably bridging on surpassing the demarcation of the evil despotism of WWII Japan and Germany, and also possibly have given an interpolated glimpse in Palestine as to what occurred to the native indigenous of America. This is what a war on an ideology-invoked by senile curmudgeons in seats of power- does best!

“Every age has its peculiar folly; some scheme, project, or fantasy into which it plunges, spurred on either by the love of gain, the necessity of excitement, or the mere force of imitation. Failing in these, it has some madness, to which it is goaded by political or religious causes, or both combined. Every one of these causes influenced the Crusades, and conspired to render them the most extraordinary instance upon record of the extent to which popular enthusiasm can be carried. History in her solemn page informs us, that the Crusaders were but ignorant and savage men, that their motives were those of bigotry unmitigated, and that their pathway was one of blood and tears…”Europe expended millions of her treasures, and the blood of two millions of her children; and a handful of quarrelsome knights retained possession of Palestine for about one hundred years!”

Siraj Davis Shames Mary Rizzo by Declaring I Don’t Believe You : Reposted from Salem News

 

Siraj Davis Shames Mary Rizzo by Declaring I Don’t Believe You : Reposted from Salem News.

Ziyad Yaghi and Mohammed Omar Aly Hassan: What the US Media is Hiding

Ziyad Yaghi and Mohammed Omar Aly Hassan: What the US Media is Hiding.

Ziyad Yaghi and Mohammed Omar Aly Hassan: What the US Media is Hiding

The News Observer stated that:

The evidence, though largely circumstantial, was nevertheless substantial,” the court said. “That evidence readily supports the determination that a rational finder of fact could (and in fact did) deem the evidence adequate to support each conviction beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Islamophobia and a Modern Witch Hunt

A ‘substantial’ amount of ‘circumstantial’ evidence does not equate into rationale. That’s extremely presumptuous and bluntly asinine. It assumes enervating a person with verbose and insignificant baloney presumes truth. An hour of viewing Fox news refutes such absurd assumption. Furthermore, I capitulate that ‘substantial’ is the most accurate adjective above.  The unwonted court’s transcripts of anecdotal evidence in relation to a ‘possible’ conspiracy artifice ranged in the unbelievable estimate of a whopping thousands of pages. The Peloponnesian War written by Thucydides, a real war of authentic facts and more credible testimonies, reached its concise and valuable zenith of 300 pages. Inundating an individual person’s life under a microscope to accumulate a ‘substantial’ amount of ‘circumstantial’ evidence tacitly avers the other immune citizens do not sustain such a lifestyle as those examined like specimens on a cutting table, it’s simply not true. Others have done far worse, yet Muslim Americans are held in higher accountability, and that’s injustice. Muslim Americans are stepping on crackers while charlatans as Jason Kellhofer screams at each crackle a stethoscope reveals. Entirely oblivious to the parade of other Americans around him.  This pogrom highlights a paramount example of the distinction between law and justice. Power wields the former, wisdom the latter.

The blustering US government and Crusading toady Kellhofer callously placed all defendants under a Scanning Transmission Electron Holography microscope, capriciously employed  tiny snippets of edited recordings from casual railleries conflated out of context, and then denied the appellants and jury and public access to that context for canvassing. For example, the prosecution submitted a public workout video of Hassan exercising in a gym-claiming it was terrorist training- but refused to allow the comment by Hassan in the message board below his video with him castigating terrorism. Furthermore, Boyce petitioned the appeals court that the defense was not permitted to cross examine Hassan and Yaghi’s Facebook posts to determine who ‘liked’ and ‘shared’ such links, what comments under these posts entailed, and under what context. As Boyce vehemently protested in the appeals trial about the government denying context, “it cut our abilities to cross examine significantly, and by some of the rulings, it gutted our defense.” The US government also snubbed evidence of Yaghi’s motive for traveling to Jordan by not acknowledging proof of his potential bride. But Hysen Sherifi’s own words accentuate Boyce’s complaint,  “when I sent Mr. McAfee to ask for these recordings, they said we’re not going to give them to you. I had made it clear that I did not want to come back to America… They set me up. They entrapped me to come back to this country, but they did not give those chats. Why?” One could argue such denial of access is the equivalent of forging a spurious narrative, not so distant from such nefarious and corrupt forgery as in the Dreyfus Affair.

Although the pharisaical Kellhofer dissembled at the appeals conference that he was not convicting the 7 men because of their innate spiritual beliefs on ‘jihad’ but on an extraterrestrial terrorist ideology, the complete kangaroo jeremiad of Kellhofer’s prosecution and the US government’s witnesses and Judge Flanagan-during the past court trial-repeatedly arrogated the vituperative tautology over the sole interpretation of jihad-along with other cardinal religious terms-as restricted to violence. They made little distinction between violent jihad and the higher non-violent forms of jihad. Thousands of pages of court transcripts are inundated with the incubus and behemoth term ‘jihad’ in them. Kellhofer even paid for the subterfuge testimony of Counter Terrorism cretin Evan Kohlmann to hijack Islam and augment such fabricated hyperboles.

Kohlmann’s passionate and honest fight against terrorism -not Islam- includes such amazing accolades as not refusing ‘one’ single offer to testify as an expert witness to enliven carceral  terrorist trials. Sounds more like a mercenary-for-hire or cheap street harlot to me. His video the Al Qaida Plan, was shown at trials of detainees at Guantanamo Bay where the chief prosecutor of the Guantanamo tribunal conceded that Kohlmann’s dilettante video was extremely prejudicial. At one trial, Kohlmann testified on the Bangladeshi Islamist party Jamaat-e-Islami, but under cross examination it was shockingly exposed that he never professionally published anything for peer review on the terrorist coterie, never visited Bangladesh, and confessed he was unaware of the name of the leader for the aforementioned faction. Kohlmann has never experienced any hostile battlefield-Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Palestine, Syria, etc-  to witness firsthand, the terrorist engagements he claims ruminant expertise upon. And Kohlmann also admitted-after testifying on Arabic terms and meanings- he doesn’t know Arabic. This supposed terrorist expert is a modern witch doctor whose last encounter or debate with me on Tweeter validated his abysmal intellect. After publicly challenging the numismatist Kohmann to provide the correct transliterations of the word ‘martyr’ and ‘witness’ in Arabic, he jilted my query and resigned in cricket chirping silence (the court documents indicate the US government, on behalf of Kohlmann’s advice, confused the English transliterations of the Arabic words for martyr and witness, incorrectly defined Fard Al Ayn, claimed ‘marriage’ and other benign common English phrases were encryption for terrorism, and much more).

Ziyad Yaghi and Mohammed Omar Aly Hassan: What the US Media is Hiding

According to the News Observer, it quoted Judge Robert King,“Of course, their argument ignores that the jury found – as it was required to do in order to convict – that the appellants had, in fact, agreed to take action in furtherance of violent jihad,” appeals court Judge Robert King wrote in the unanimous opinion.”Their convictions rest not only on their agreement to join one another in a common terrorist scheme, but also on a series of calculated overt acts in furtherance of that scheme,” King wrote. The media omits that the jury of the litigants’ peers had not one Arab or Muslim, one ‘attentive’ juror was caught napping, and the majority were elderly southern remnants of the ‘calm’ Cold War and ‘fair’ segregation. Likewise, the trial of the 7 defendants were under a modern McCarthyist-Red Scare witch hunt vis-a-vis the War OF Terrorism and the trial was also held on the week of the anniversary of the 9-11 attacks -which defense attorney Dan Boyce complained about at the appeals conference- wherein the American public, including the jurors, were re-indoctrinated with massive propaganda of the War Of Terrorism. Contrary to Judge Robert King’s assertion that “the appellants had, in fact, agreed to take action in furtherance of violent jihad” in what he describes as a “series of calculated overt acts in furtherance of that scheme,” there was no explicit agreement nor overt acts. I personally and publicly impugn the honorable Robert King and the media’s credibility and honor, sincerely, to refute my challenge publicly via replacing media censorship with pertinent facts from the case in regards to Yaghi and Hassan. One insouciant appeals judge chimed in, ”after a certain point, don’t these pieces of evidence begin to add up to a point where the jury can draw a perfectly reasonable inference that we allow them to do all the time?…shouldn’t we at the end of the day, give some, ummm, credit to the conclusions that they came up with? I mean sometimes we have trials that maybe last half a day or a day, but this one went on for a whole month.”I retort that declaring generalizing weak platitudes with fallacious assumptions as a jury’s unanimous decision is 100 percent immutably correct, was insufficient as a heuristic for justice with the boys of Scottsboro or in the trial of the Haymarket Riots, as it is now.

via Ziyad Yaghi and Mohammed Omar Aly Hassan: What the US Media is Hiding.

Ziyad Yaghi and Mohammed Omar Aly Hassan: What the US Media is Hiding

An Evil Unseen Ideology Made Me Do It Finally, the foppish prosecution and media excluded the primary feeble premise employed by Kellhofer to establish the litigants possessed an agreement for conspiracy. The prosecution embellished the appellants shared the same seed of ‘terrorist ideology’ -as the prosecution described it- because Boyd testified that he believed-admitting an absence of certainty- that some of the defendants comprehended that he meant violent jihad when he vocally ‘inculcated’ others with such loose phrases as ‘find a way’ or ‘order ice cream’ or ‘marriage’ or ‘best brothers’, and other cockamamie . It was Boyd’s testimony, after turning state’s witness that the prosecution heralded around as the leit motif against a few immigrants -a couple incapable of functionally communicating in the English language- to assert that the accused wanted to commit violent jihad. I say that just because a participant in a casual conversation is recorded complaining about his ‘blue’ shirt and another mentioning his sister is ’17′ years old, it doesn’t translate into an audible for a pass from a certain formation to a rushing pattern of receivers in American football. Neither does the prosecution’s cherry-picked dummy calls of imaginative and neo-logistic jargon for terrorism. Kellhofer and the US government’s estranged-from-reality logic runs further than this though. Kellhofer outlandishly and explicitly besmirched that all 7 defendants were die-hard followers of Islamic Sharia law. To an astounded, frightful, and ignorant jury; Kellhofer’s trumpery claim was that these followers of Islamic Sharia law were anti-Western, anti-secular government, and -the most ludicrous proposition by Kellhofer- obliged by Islamic Sharia law to not only viciously fight against Western governments, but to cold-heartedly murder or maim ‘any’ Westerner. This is ‘not’ Kellhofer’s meretricious characterization though, but informant Melvin Week’s definition of Sherifi’s ideology during trial questioning by Ms. Kocher, as Weeks concluded his explanation -which Kellhofer ‘exactly’ echoed in the preceding sentence- stating, “and this ideology and the people who follow it are known for that. This is what — they’ve been known for this since 700 A.D.” This ideology’s depiction was also Evan Kohlmann’s when he preposterously claimed that Salafi Jihadis are a sect of Islam during the court. Salafism is a sect of Islam, not Salafi Jihadis. It was also Boyd’s classification when he alleged Anes Subaisac was infected with this contagious ‘ideology’ because the latter opposed voting.shariasharia-protest-in-USanes-subasicanes-subasic At the appeals conference, Kellhofer stated to the judges that when Yaghi praised a man -by liking his post on Facebook- who said he would cut his own flesh out instead of giving up any piece of Palestine, it was evidence of this ideology that is inherently opposed to “any government” and an example of Yaghi’s idea of “Muslims uniting against the kufar, again a government.” Kellhofer’s rational is not wanting, it’s grossly noisome and outrageous. Many believers of Islamic Sharia across the world do not engage in violent jihad against the West, or kill a Westerner. Yet, the tenets of Sharia law were exactly what the prosecution highlighted as proof of the presence of this suspicious alien ‘ideology’ within the 7 defendants. As Kellhofer stated about this ideology at the appeals court,“they believed that any non-Muslim is known as a Kufar, somewhat a derogatory term used by them. That the kufars are a hindrance to the further growth of Islam. That Muslims therefore should not be ruled by Kufar, that Muslims should be ruled by Sharia law. That any non-Muslim government is therefore a kufar government, and one that is in effect precluding and stopping Sharia law from happening. Therefore, under their cultish belief, you are ‘obligated’ as a Muslim, to take an offensive attack so that you’re later not put in a position of being defensive. So if you are a non-Muslim, and you are in a Muslim land, that’s a problem.”It is unclear if Kellhofer is conscious that Yaghi and Hassan were peacefully residing for twenty years in the non-Muslim land of America without committing violent jihad, radicalized Muslims don’t write rap lyrics mentioning marijuana or smoke it like Hassan, and that Yaghi is Palestinian which would completely explain his aggressive incongruities toward US foreign policy in regards to Palestine instead of his blind devotion or oblation to radical Islam or Sharia Law. I also found it unconscionable that Kellhofer – during the appeals meeting- championed his injustice as the equivalent reasoning of indicting bank robbers agreeing to target a bank, without mention of what specific bank. I believe that the true plundering was the US tax dollars in Kellhofer’s defalcation in fatuous pursuit of this Don Quixote Crusade.

via Ziyad Yaghi and Mohammed Omar Aly Hassan: What the US Media is Hiding.

Ziyad Yaghi and Mohammed Omar Aly Hassan: What the US Media is Hiding

Ziyad Yaghi and Mohammed Omar Aly Hassan: What the US Media is Hiding.

Ziyad Yaghi and Mohammed Omar Aly Hassan: What the US Media is Hiding

Shady Criminal Informants and the 2nd Amendment

What the media is also not divulging is that all of the ‘weapons’ were encountered at Daniel Boyd’s house. They were also registered to Boyd. The ‘raising of money’ was a private transfer of a meager amount-approximately $500 is an absurd amount to fund an insurgency- between Sherifi (in Kosovo) and Boyd (in America).  Also, the ‘training’ involved discharging firearms -in a constitutionally protected right- in the forests by Sherifi and Daniel Boyd. Yaghi and Hassan were not significantly implicated in the above. However, as in the UK case of Muhammad Hamid , the prosecution included Yaghi’s innocuous paintball competition and Hassan’s possession of a 22 caliber pea-shooter rifle -which the latter concealed in a private compartment in his car and showed to Boyd on one occasion- augmented the guilt of both callow defendants as training for violent jihad abroad. I can’t comment on others’ thoughts, but I wouldn’t take a 22 pea-shooter rifle to any battlefront. Kellhofer-during the appeals conference- reasserted that because Hassan asked Boyd ‘privately’ to come to his car and view the weapon, it was evidence of training, and an act toward conspiracy to commit violent jihad abroad. As Yaghi’s attorney politely reiterated that this was insufficient evidence to prove a conspiracy at the appeals conference, Judge Robert King replied with emetic caducity, “why would they hide that thang [Hassan’s 22 rifle]  they found in that spot [private compartment in Hassan’s vehicle]?”

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2010/10/466354.html

Commenting further upon the Constitution’s 2nd amendment right of possessing and discharging firearms, I have a paltry amount of collegiate friends yet with an aggregate number of various automatic firearm wielding photos on Facebook. One cohort, accompanied by other gun toting acquaintances, has a picture snapped 5 years ago of him releasing rounds from an AK 47 in the forests, while another picture displays him sporting a contumacious shirt with an emblem of a recognized US State Department Latin American terrorist group. Such young phatic bravado doesn’t mean he and his friends are violent or  pertinacious terrorists. On the contrary, he is now an esteemed teacher in East Asia. There are other examples too. The exigent unanswered probe is how many others have played paintball and discharged firearms in forests, without being charged with terrorism? And why? The results of my investigation from the preceding query is that Hassan and Yaghi’s convictions are simply discriminatory injustice.

The media and prosecution also relentlessly elude to the identities and moral character of the government’s informants. Not me! They were comprised of a former multiple felon of armed robbery Alvin Harris and a visa overstay Abdullah Eddarkoui whom were promised immunity from past legal violations, $200,000 in cash, and the latter a green card. Why weren’t ‘any’ of the prosecution’s witnesses of astute or half-way decent character and morality? Couldn’t the prosecution find any!? Even the prosecution’s star witness – Daniel Boyd- had a past history of robbing banks in Pakistan. Regardless, none of the informants attested that Yaghi and Hassan intended to perform violent jihad.