Archive

Archive for June, 2018

New Evidence Ignored in Case of Ziyad Yaghi: (Audio-Video-Affidavits)


The evidence I collected above was introduced by the CLCMA to the U.S. Supreme Court for Yaghi’s retrial. The highest court in America denied Yaghi a retrial on the grounds of protecting ‘National Security.’ It is my assumption, and why, I can’t and won’t reveal, that the Jordanian Intelligence gave ‘bad’ intel on Yaghi. Any dilettante on the GID knows how politically and financially motivated their ‘intel’ has become under a profitable War of Terrorism. Also, I have the assumption that Yaghi and others were imprisoned for having prior criminal records and simultaneously being Muslim, so as to avoid security risks in exchange for their constitutional and human rights by the upper echelons of the US government.

 

via New Evidence Ignored in Case of Ziyad Yaghi: (Audio-Video-Affidavits)

New Evidence Ignored in Case of Ziyad Yaghi: (Audio-Video-Affidavits)


 

On July 27, 2009 the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) incarcerated seven men for conspiracy to commit terrorism in Raleigh, North Carolina. The shocking case was dubbed “the Raleigh Jihad” or “Terror Triangle” plots. The government’s salmagundi narrative was that at an unspecified time and date, with unknown weapons and obscure methods, these North Carolinian Muslim Americans who were gullibly brainwashed by an idiosyncratic ring leader, Daniel Boyd, would suddenly engage a design of monumental proportions which in Don Quixote tittup, would put a Rambo sequel to undeniable shame.

The FBI, in a strange theatrical version of the movie the Minority Report, claimed the accuseds’ thoughts, derived from voice recordings and witness testimonies and Facebook posts, were evidence that they intended to simultaneously attack the heavily fortified Marine Corps base in Quantico in Virginia, ignite a jihad war in Kosovo and Iraq (Iraq already a location of insurgency), and bomb unidentified targets in Israel. The prosecuting attorney, Jason Kellhoffer, former defense attorney for Calvin Hill in the controversial case of the murder of Airman Ashley Turner at a U.S. Air force base in Iceland, employed NBC terrorism quack, Evan Kohlman, to convince a naive non-Muslim jury that the defendants had the “radical ideology” akin to violent terrorists in the Middle East. Kohlman is the same figure that reputable Central Intelligence Agency employees, Marc Sageman and Philip Giraldi, have summarily described as fraudulent.

 

via New Evidence Ignored in Case of Ziyad Yaghi: (Audio-Video-Affidavits)

New Evidence Ignored in Case of Ziyad Yaghi: (Audio-Video-Affidavits)


 

However, appending Ziyad Yaghi’s case to history’s pages may allow America may to be a gleaming example of how even great nations make mistakes, so that others may be more willing to admit and correct similar injustice. This is the other, or next instrument, against the cruel obstinacy and dangerous hubris of the law, which sometimes is the unfortunate antithesis of a higher principal of justice. This is also the next powerless step in never ceasing to protest injustice, as American Jewish writer Elie Wiesel asserted we humans must strive to continue to do always.

Until then, an innocent Ziyad Yaghi will be nearer to finishing his thirty year solitary confinement in a federal penitentiary, for a thought crime he perhaps never contemplated, and undeniably, never even committed.

 

 

via New Evidence Ignored in Case of Ziyad Yaghi: (Audio-Video-Affidavits)

New Evidence Ignored in Case of Ziyad Yaghi: (Audio-Video-Affidavits)


 

Convictions such as Yaghi, and possibly the Duka brothers in the Fort Dix 5, the Newburgh 4, Yasmin Cassim’s father in the United Kingdom, and more may also be textbook examples of an affront to Due Process and Rule of Law wherein these Muslims, as with Yaghi, have been prosecuted for akin actions and statements that I have witnessed many times over, by some white Anglo-Saxon protestants extremists often.  The subtle difference is these Muslims may have made comments opposing U.S. Foreign policy in such places as Israel and so on. So much for Clarrence Darrow’s wisdom, “True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.”

 

via New Evidence Ignored in Case of Ziyad Yaghi: (Audio-Video-Affidavits)

New Evidence Ignored in Case of Ziyad Yaghi: (Audio-Video-Affidavits)


Human Rights Watch (HRW) in its publication titled “Illusion of Justice,” underscored that the prosecutor Mr. Kellhoffer strangely asserted terms employed by Yaghi in his email communication with Boyd in 2006, while the former was in Jordan and latter in America, such as marriage, beach, and pizza; were covert code for terrorism. HRW added that FBI agent Robert Powell admitted that there was no substantial evidence to prove Yaghi traveled to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan for terrorism in 2006. Finally, HRW concluded that Yaghi’s conviction, including the other six defendants, was a clear violation of not only the United States Constitution, but international human rights laws.

 

 

via New Evidence Ignored in Case of Ziyad Yaghi: (Audio-Video-Affidavits)

New Evidence Ignored in Case of Ziyad Yaghi: (Audio-Video-Affidavits)


I pray history will bear witness to this dismal injustice within her pages for our posterity, more importantly, for humanity. Highlighting the injustice to Ziyad and his poor family would interpret into America is fallible, which I find benign. Pointing out such injustice would also interpret into our government violates our sacred Bill of Rights during conflict, which history reveals isn’t original or unfamiliar.

However, appending Ziyad Yaghi’s case to history’s pages may allow America may to be a gleaming example of how even great nations make mistakes, so that others may be more willing to admit and correct similar injustice. This is the other, or next instrument, against the cruel obstinacy and dangerous hubris of the law, which sometimes is the unfortunate antithesis of a higher principal of justice. This is also the next powerless step in never ceasing to protest injustice, as American Jewish writer Elie Wiesel asserted we humans must strive to continue to do always.

Until then, an innocent Ziyad Yaghi will be nearer to finishing his thirty year solitary confinement in a federal penitentiary, for a thought crime he perhaps never contemplated, and undeniably, never even committed.

via New Evidence Ignored in Case of Ziyad Yaghi: (Audio-Video-Affidavits)

New Evidence Ignored in Case of Ziyad Yaghi: (Audio-Video-Affidavits)


After perusing the teeming pages of court transcripts which would be comparable to Herodotus’ Histories, a purveying sense of terror struck my nerve cords. That sense of fear didn’t derive from reading the maniacal thoughts similar to Al Qaeda and the Islamic State within the documents. Instead, I concluded one defendant, Ziyad Yaghi, was convicted diametric to English Common Law and William Blackstone’s advice, “it is better to let ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent may suffer.”

via New Evidence Ignored in Case of Ziyad Yaghi: (Audio-Video-Affidavits)

New Evidence Ignored in Case of Ziyad Yaghi: (Audio-Video-Affidavits)


 

I sincerely conceive that the Ziyad Yaghi’s conviction has no possible merit whatsoever with exemption to a world of Agatha Christie and Harry Potter imagination. In this lifetime, I’ve determined Montesquieu was absolutely right, “there is no crueler tyranny than that which is perpetuated under the shield of law and in the name of justice.” Ziyad Yaghi’s tragedy is a microcosm of such sad yet sagacious dictum.

 

via New Evidence Ignored in Case of Ziyad Yaghi: (Audio-Video-Affidavits)

New Evidence Ignored in Case of Ziyad Yaghi: (Audio-Video-Affidavits)


The following investigation and report, I concluded on behalf of the Constitutional Law Center for Muslims in America (CLCMA) and Attorney and former U.S. Navy Lieutenant Commander Charles Swift It regards new evidence from an on the ground investigation which was initially omitted and not introduced into a United States trial case for the defendant, Ziyad Yaghi.
 
The new evidence presented in this report highlights the Western mainstream media’s bias toward upholding the War of Terrorism scare narrative and their lack of passion toward true journalism; via not thoroughly investigating such facts as contained within this report, nor making such revelations public to the audience. It also seriously questions the respect by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and US Attorney’s Office for the Rule of Law, Due Process, and US Constitutional and human rights of dissidents in America. The FBI, Jason Kellhoffer, the Western media, and the defense attorney for Yaghi; all failed to investigate and avoided easily accessible evidence, which refuted allegations against Yaghi.
 
The peculiar case of the farcical conviction of Ziyad Yaghi in 2011, for unspecified terrorism, has monumental and gossamer flaws evident to the perspicacious. The federal government claimed Yaghi traveled to Amman Jordan in 2006, in order to commit terrorism in Israel/Palestine, but arrested him in 2009. The obvious yet most curious query is why didn’t the authorities detain Yaghi in 2006 when he returned to the United States from Jordan, in the first place?
 
The answer to the aforementioned query is, that Yaghi was arrested in 2009 instead of 2006, because the entire terrorism narrative against him was concocted by the the prosecutor Jason Kellhoffer, in 2009 alone.
 

 

via New Evidence Ignored in Case of Ziyad Yaghi: (Audio-Video-Affidavits)

Categories: Uncategorized

New Evidence Ignored in Case of Ziyad Yaghi: (Audio-Video-Affidavits)


The following investigation and report, I concluded on behalf of the Constitutional Law Center for Muslims in America (CLCMA) and Attorney and former U.S. Navy Lieutenant Commander Charles Swift (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Swift). It regards new evidence from an on the ground investigation which was initially omitted and not introduced into a United States trial case for the defendant, Ziyad Yaghi.

The new evidence presented in this report highlights the Western mainstream media’s bias toward upholding the War of Terrorism scare narrative and their lack of passion toward true journalism; via not thoroughly investigating such facts as contained within this report, nor making such revelations public to the audience. It also seriously questions the respect by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and US Attorney’s Office for the Rule of Law, Due Process, and US Constitutional and human rights of dissidents in America. The FBI, Jason Kellhoffer, the Western media, and the defense attorney for Yaghi; all failed to investigate and avoided easily accessible evidence, which refuted allegations against Yaghi.

The peculiar case of the farcical conviction of Ziyad Yaghi in 2011, for unspecified terrorism, has monumental and gossamer flaws evident to the perspicacious. The federal government claimed Yaghi traveled to Amman Jordan in 2006, in order to commit terrorism in Israel/Palestine, but arrested him in 2009. The obvious yet most curious query is why didn’t the authorities detain Yaghi in 2006 when he returned to the United States from Jordan, in the first place?

The answer to the aforementioned query is, that Yaghi was arrested in 2009 instead of 2006, because the entire terrorism narrative against him was concocted by the the prosecutor Jason Kellhoffer, in 2009 alone.

via New Evidence Ignored in Case of Ziyad Yaghi: (Audio-Video-Affidavits)

Categories: Uncategorized